Should College Athletes Be Paid Pros And Cons Essay
Olivia Luz
Based on the human capital model the scope of athletics in colleges represents a positive contribution to human development and well being.
They also would not perform up to their full potential and there s no fair way to pay these athletes. Such is the case with this type of essay. Young athletes already receive many things that non athletes do not. Because of the revenues their activities generate the pros and cons of paying college athletes are closely scrutinized.
Paying athletes may bring in more revenue but how much of that will actually go back to the college or institution that they play for. First and foremost college athletes should not get paid because they already receive scholarships. It would culminate into a situation where the only motive the athletes have for playing is money and not the sportsman drive of winning games and trophies. Why do college athletes that put in just as much work get paid differently.
It will help to show your readers that you ve done your homework on the topic. Below are a few potential pros and cons of paying college athletes. The pros and cons of paying college athletes essay 660 words 3 pages. Paying college athletes for their participation in sports eliminates the need for them to find outside employment to support themselves.
RELATED ARTICLE :
- do you look like your zodiac sign clothes
- do you need a membership to shop at bj s wholesale
- do you need a business license to sell on etsy in maryland
The college athletes bring in a lot of money to their institutions. Pros and cons of college athlets being paid by college pros. Whether or not college athletes should be paid is a huge controversy in today s society and includes many pros and cons. In my opinion college athletes should not get paid because they already receive a scholarship that pays for tuition classes and housing.
List of the pros of paying college athletes. College athletes make enough money for colleges that it would not hurt to give some back. The players should receive some of this money because without them the schools cannot be able to receive all the popularity and the money. It encourages healthier student athletes.
One pro being that college athletics provide revenue for companies but if we were to play devil s advocate one could say that the student athletes already receive benefits through the school such as scholarship money grants and part time jobs. Makes 18 million dollars a year the average college athlete makes no money at all. Pros support their families players would be able to actually afford a decent meal and possibly send some money back home. This is the way many people feel about ncaa s decision to not pay college athletes.
RELATED ARTICLE :
Statistics on college athletes can also come in handy.Source : pinterest.com